The Law of One Search Results for ‘What is You’re name’

Show menu

Results 2501 to 2519 of 2519

⇐ Previous 100

Search type: any / all / phrase.
Sort by: relevance / session.

24.22 Questioner: …but they were just bothering me. We will continue in our next session with the Law of One and keep that uppermost in the scope of the book and try to get more deeply into the philosophy as we build a framework for reference to the philosophy. Thank you very much.

Ra: I—

26.9 Questioner: Thank you. Could you please make the instrument cough?

Ra: [Cough.]

26.14 Questioner: Could you please make the instrument cough?

Ra: [Cough.]

26.29 Questioner: Could you please make the instrument cough? And…

Ra: [Cough.]

26.37 Questioner: Thank you very much. Could you please make the instrument cough?

Ra: [Cough.]

26.39 Questioner: If you would please make the instrument cough, I will ask one— two quick things.

Ra: [Cough.]

28.17 Questioner: Thank you. Would you please make the instrument cough again?

Ra: [Cough.]

31.1 Questioner: I would like to ask a question first for the instrument herself. She request[s] to know if it would be advisable for her to walk alone now that she feels better.*

Ra: I am Ra. This is acceptable.

46.1 Questioner: Could we please first have an indication of the instrument’s condition?

Ra: I am Ra. This instrument scans at present at extremely low physical energy and is under attack. This will continue for some of your weeks. However, the vital energy of this instrument is gradually restoring its former level.

46.6 Questioner: At this time I would ask if we should end the session because of the instrument’s low vitality, or whether this is irrelevant because of the dedication to this session already.

Ra: I am Ra. The latter is correct. You may proceed. We shall monitor the vital energy of this instrument.

50.10 Questioner: I know of people who have been recently trained in meditation, who after a very short period of intense meditation, a couple of days or so, are able to cause the action at a distance effect on metal, bending it. It’s my understanding that they are wearing a pyramid-shaped wire on their heads while doing this. I was invited to one of the meditation sessions a couple of years ago but I couldn’t get there. Could you comment on this process, and if they are accomplishing anything of value or not?

Ra: I am Ra. No. Please ask one more full query at this working.

54.20 Questioner: I meant— I understand how a positively oriented entity would program catalyst such as that would result in physical pain if it— I’m assuming that an entity could program something that would give it the experience of physical pain if it did not follow the path that it had selected. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. Please restate query.

58.16 Questioner: I can see how a solid-sided pyramid would act as a funnel. It seems to me that using just the four rods joined at the apex angle would be less efficient. Can you tell me how they are equivalent to the solid-sided pyramid?

Ra: I am Ra. They are unequal in space/time, and we recommend for practical use the solid-sided pyramid or other focusing shape in order to give your physical bodily complexes respite from outside noise, rain, and other distractions to meditation. However, in time/space one is concerned with the electro-magnetic field produced by the shape. An equivalent field is produced by the solid and the open shape. Light is influenced metaphysically by this field rather than by visible shapes.

69.2 Questioner: Do you mean that the physical energy is completely depleted?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct, although we have physical energy transferred and available for this working.

72.16 Questioner: Is it possible to over-energize the instrument with sexual energy transfers?

Ra: I am Ra. No.

73.15 Questioner: You said that if the entity says that no working comes from it but only through it it is also infringing. Is that correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. We said that in that event there is no infringement.

100.5 Questioner: Is it all right for Colonel Stevens to receive the information that Ra just gave to us?

Ra: I am Ra. We find this information to be confirmation of already perceived ideas. Therefore, permission is freely given.

69.1 Questioner: [Question about the instrument’s condition, not on tape.]

Ra: I am Ra. It is as previously stated.

100.4 Questioner: Thank you. I feel obligated to ask the next, somewhat transient, question because of a request from Colonel Stevens. I also, for my own edification, [would like to] better understand the effect of the quarantine and first distortion. Would Ra comment on the purpose of the so-called Pleiades contact in Switzerland with Billy Meier— an entity known as Semjase and others.

Ra: I am Ra. It is not our practice to judge the value of a contact of metaphysical origin. We cannot confirm the contact referred to by the questioner as pure Confederation contact. However, we might suggest that there is some positive material within the recorded transcript of converse during this contact. As we have spoken previously to the various characteristics of so-called mixed contact, we shall not repeat, but note that all communication is of the One Infinite Creator in its infinite distortions.

⇐ Previous 100

Back to top

The original Law of One books are copyright ©1982, 1984, 1998 L/L Research. The Ra Contact books are copyright ©2018 L/L Research and Tobey Wheelock.
This site copyright ©2003–2024 Tobey Wheelock.

Questions? Comments? Email me: tw at law of one dot info.